There have always been conflicts between individual rights and national security interests in democracies. Limits on civil liberties during wartime, including restrictions on free speech, public assembly, and mass detentions, have been the most serious threats to individual freedom. Even in peacetime, counter-terrorist measures including profiling, detention, and exclusion, along with the use of national identification cards, have raised concerns about racism, constitutional violations, and the loss of privacy. With the passage of new anti-terrorist laws after September 11, 2001, these tensions have increased. Supporters of broader governmental powers insist that they are part of the increased security measures necessary to safeguard national security. In contrast, many civil rights groups fear that the infringement upon individual rights is another step in the erosion of democratic civil society.
Wartime measures. The severest restrictions on civil liberties have occurred in times of war. In September 1862, during the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) suspended the right of habeas corpus in order to allow federal authorities to arrest and detain suspected Confederate sympathizers without arrest warrants or speedy trials. Well aware of the drastic nature of such a step, Lincoln justified it as a necessary wartime measure. After the United States Supreme Court found Lincoln's abrogation of habeas corpus an unconstitutional intrusion on Congressional authority, Congress itself ratified the measure by passing the Habeas Corpus Act in September 1863. Through 1864, about 14,000 people were arrested under the act; about one in seven were detained at length in federal prisons, most on allegations of offering aid to the Confederacy but others on corruption and fraud charges.
Read more: http://www.faqs.org/espionage/In-Int/Intelligence-and-Democracy-Issues-and-Conflicts.html#ixzz4XX37pHRv
The correct answer is France
When the French revolution happened, most of the Nobility that hadn't escaped was executed, and all things relating to the Church were forbidden. Even the calendar was changed because the names of months were related to Christian things. It influenced numerous political revolutions, Haiti just being one of the country that started a revolution.
The correct answer is that Emma Goldman supported labor union (she was against the capitalist system) and Henry Frick the owner of the Homestead steel plant was against it.
The Homestead strike began at the steel plant in the Homestead. This strike took place because the management under the leadership of Henry Frick ( known for his contempt of workers and labor unions) wanted to demolish the union at the plant in order to reduce the wages. Whereas, Emma Goldman (opposed the idea of wage reduce given by Frick) was a political activist who supported the rights of workers
Here we are again xD
The answer to your question is
B Palestinians terrorists kidnapped and murdered eleven Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics.
Whast are u aasking any more details ]