1)It has a positive effect on students learning compared to individual conditions
2)Students may explain things to one another better than a teacher to class
3)Students learns how to explain things to one another and they learns to help each other
4) It improves students communication skills and then it helps them in future
5)Questions are more likely to asked and answered in a group settings
I think it is either a or b
I hope this kinda helps you
True expl.For many years, it has been generally accepted that standards control access to markets. Consider, for example, the following statements. “The technology standard has become the source of a core competitive edge for industrial development. To some extent, a technology standard is a kind of development order and rule. Whoever controls the power of standard making and has its technology as the leading standard, commands the initiative of the market. Technology standards have become an important means of global economic competition, and directly influence the competitiveness of an industry, region or country. Therefore, as for Chinese enterprises, possessing the successful standard is a strategic choice to seize the leadership of the future industrial development.”
<span>A sociologist might look at the amount of fresh fruits and vegetables available in a neighborhood trying to understand social issues that affect health. If you can find and afford to live in a neighborhood where you can shop for fresh fruits and vegetables more often, near home, you may be more likely to consume those foods more regularly.</span>
Answer:
The correct option is D: taking the cost into account because money spent on pollution reduction is not available for other worthy activities
Explanation:
According to Lawrence Summers analysis, every spend for healthcare needs to be beneficial to the economy at the lowest possible cost. Hence looking at it from his point of view, it would be more moral to reduce pollution, looking at the cost of doing this. This is because there are other aspects that need money and if this money is spent on pollution without considering other areas, then there would not be enough money available for other worthy activities.
