B because it restates other ideas to sum it up
Claims of Cause and Effect:
Did it happen?
Does it exist?
Is it good or bad?
What should be
our criteria in
deciding?
If you are claiming that something is better or worse in relation to something else, you are making a claim of value. For example,
Video games are a waste of time,
sports are the best way to build
character, and savings
accounts are the
worst way to
accumulate wealth,
are all values
claims.
Answer:
From my point of view, I would say Jurors 3, 10, and 12 are most stubborn because, juror 3 is so dogmatic, juror 10 is somewhat like a bigot and 12 is just business man who sees everything ambiguously.
<span>The answer to the question is, "It seems that Kahlo's parents did not care about their daughter." This statement is asserting a subjective opinion that is open to interpretation depending on the overall emotion of the reader and author. The other statements, "Frida Kahlo's parents did not visit her in the hospital. The Kahlo family struggled with poverty and other issues. Matita, Frida's sister, came frequently to help at the hospital," are just asserting facts, not opinions.</span>
