Manga Carta has significance in today's government systems because it gave the people power. When it was created in 1215, the government in England had been traditionally run but the King. However, when the people were tired of the unfair power of John Swoftsword, they revolted. They forced him to sign the Magna Carta, giving them rights that they had never had before. The Magna Carta led to the creation of the model parliament, which was a pathway to a more democratic government. As of late, democracies are the most common form of government. This was greatly influenced by the power granted to the people as a result of the Magna Carta. Although people have and still are fighting for their rights, the leadership of the citizens in England of the time of the creation of Magna Carta greatly influenced the amount of power given to the people today.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Any source in History can be biased. It can be based on personal opinion, pressure, etc.
Let's take an example. Let's say we want to learn more about Hitler, and we have a primary source that we are analysing. The primary source is a diary entry from a Nazi propagandist, and in the diary entry he talks about how Hitler is like a reincarnation of God, he will lead Germany and the world to greatness and is all in all a great guy.
Straight away, you can tell that that is biased.
So to summarise, anything can be biased. It isn't related to what type of source it is. If you want to analyse and interpret sources, you will need to have lots of different primary and secondary sources at hand, and compare them to find the best answer and analysis.
Hope this helps
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Sharecropping was a form of farming adopted post-Civil War in the United States. In this form of farming, the landowners would give their lands to black families to work and instead of giving them wages, the families were required to pay or share a portion of the crops cultivated by them to their landowners by the end of the year.
The sharecropping agreement, therefore, is an agreement that favored the employers or the landowners instead of the sharecroppers.
Therefore, the given statement is false.
