Answer:
D) Quantity sold rose while the effect on price is ambiguous.
Explanation:
Two separate things happened here;
- Change in consumer habits have shifted the the demand curve to the right, increasing the quantity demanded at every price level.
- Better technology and lower costs have also shifted the supply curve to the right, increasing the quantity supplied at every price level.
One thing is certain, the quantity demanded and supplied increased, so the total quantity sold definitely increased. The price issue is not certain because you would need additional information about which shift was larger, the shift of the supply curve or the demand curve.
Given these assumptions, you should not buy this hybrid.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The idea of the present value factor depends on the time estimation of cash - that is, cash gotten now is worth more than cash got later on, since cash got now can be reinvested in an elective speculation to procure extra money.
The PV of the savings funds is $2,070 which is not exactly the cost of difference. You need a more noteworthy reserve funds to financially legitimize the acquisition of this hybrid car (for example the NPV is negative).
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the cash flow from the operating activities is presented below:
Marion Company
Cash flow statement
Cash flow from operating activities
Net income $170,000
Adjustment made
Add: Depreciation expenses $50,000
less: Increase in account receivable -$8,000 ($40,000 - $32,000)
Add: Decrease in inventory $8,000 ($50,000 - $58,000)
Less: Decrease in account payable -$7,000 ($11,000 - $18,000)
Add: Increase in salaries payable $4,000 ($10,000 - $6,000)
Net cash provided by operating activities $217,000
The cash inflow represents in a positive sign and the cash outflow represents in a negative sign
Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
a. Ethics play a very important role in any organization. Ethics ensures the legitimacy and reputation of the organization. Therefore, it cannot be ignored that Mr. Dimon has disregarded the ethical norms when serving as the CEO and Chairman of JPMorgan. Even though the business is earning profits, such fraudulent and unfair business activities should not be acceptable by the company.
With regards to this, as the chairman, I would fire Mr. Dimon for his immoral way in conducting business activities. This will also set an example for others.
b) As far as the CEO's compensation is concerned, pay shouldn't be just for business performance or profits but also for ethical performance. A business without values and ethics cannot succeed in the long run. Even though profits are vital, they shouldn't be at the cost of morality and ethics.
Therefore, it is vital to compensate the CEO after considering every essential factors and not just on the basis of the businesss performance.
c) A proper Performance Analysis in an organization is made up of all the criterias required to measure the performance of both the company and the employees. Regarding the situation in the question, the ethical dilemma can be solved through the consideration of ethical conduct as an equal and important factor when evaluating pay for performance. Therefore, the pay for performance should include ethical and business aspects together which will lead to more transparency when assessing the compensation.
Answer:
Lapping
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in this scenario we can state that this is an example of a term known as Lapping. This term refers to moving a customer's payment to another customer's account. This process is completely illegal and is usually done when someone is "cooking the books", which means that they are manipulating financial data in order to hide illegal money movements.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
