I’m not sure but this is what I would do
Runner A (unit rate / constant of proportionality):
54 feet divided by 4.5 seconds = 12 feet per second
Runner B (unit rate / constant of proportionality): 300 feet divided by 20 seconds (It looks like the end point of the line lands between 300 feet and 20 seconds) = 15 feet per second
Unit Rate:
Runner A = 12 feet per second
Runner B = 15 feet per second
Faster Runner:
Runner B is the faster runner as he can run a further distance than Runner A in one second.
Answer:
x = 200
y = 100
Step-by-step explanation:
20x + 30y = 7000 Divide by 10
15x + 35y = 6500 Divide by 5
===============
It helps if you break down both equations to something simpler. It looks like not always.
(2x + 3y = 700) Multiply by 3
(3x + 7y = 1300) Multiply by 2
==================
6x + 9y = 2100
<u>6x + 14y =2600</u> Subtract
-5y = - 500 Divide by -5
-5y/-5 = -500/-5
y = 100
2x + 3y = 700 substitute y = 100
2x+ 3*100 = 700 Combine
2x + 300 = 700 Subtract 300 from both sides.
2x = 700 - 300
2x = 400
x = 400/2
x = 200
===================
Hockey check
15x + 35y = 6500
15*200 + 35*100 = 6500
3000 + 3500 = 6500 Just as it should.
The answer is c ok this is C
Answer:
(a) There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion equals 0.11.
(b) p-value is 0.0548
(c) Critical values are -2.58, 2.58
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) Conclusion:
Fail to reject H0 because the p-value 0.0548 is greater than the significance level 0.01.
(b) The test is a two-tailed test because the alternate hypothesis is expressed using not equal to.
Test statistic (z) = (p' - p) ÷ sqrt[p(1-p) ÷ n]
p' is sample proportion = 0.16
p is population proportion = 0.11
n is sample size = 150
z = (0.16 - 0.11) ÷ sqrt[0.11(1-0.11) ÷ 150] = 0.05 ÷ 0.026 = 1.92
Cumulative area of the test statistic is 0.9726
p-value for a two-tailed test = 2(1 - 0.9726) = 2(0.0274) = 0.0548
(c) The critical values of the test statistic are -2.58, 2.58
Answer:
25
Step-by-step explanation:
150 divided by 6