1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
3 years ago
5

Explain how the Scientific revolution relates to the increasing secularization of the nineteenth century.

History
1 answer:
vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

this is long sorry.

Explanation:

The Scientific Revolution was initially a movement that buttressed Christianity. Only in the late 19th century did science become a secularizing force.

It’s often claimed that empirical validation replaced religious authority. That’s a facile assumption but false.

In fact, Boyle and Newton were fervent Christians who believed that modern science provided endless and compelling evidence of God’s Design and existence. Indeed, this was the chief value of science. This attitude prevailed throughout the eighteenth century. Christianity gained a new modern justification in science.

The chief secularizers were not scientists, but Enlightenment philosophers. Their beliefs would become enshrined in the constitutions that would secularize society. The most important of them - Locke, Rousseau and Voltaire - were Christians. Their disgust with religious wars and religious tyranny, and their respect for the dignity of independent thought, drove them to challenge Christian authoritarianism. The Scientific Revolution played little role here.

A few secularists such as d’Holbach and La Mettrie were more clearly driven by scientific views, namely, atomism, but their views had marginal influence on secularism. Moreover, their atheistic materialism has a lineage separate from the Scientific Revolution. It encompasses Spinoza, the School of Padua (philosophers such as Zabarella and Pomponazzi), and the 14th century rediscovery of Lucretius, and it was born from philosophical considerations, not by scientific method. By contrast, whenever materialism intersected the Scientific Revolution, natural philosophers, such as Descartes, Gassendi, and Malebranche endeavored as dutiful Christians to re-infuse that materialism with God.

It wasn’t until the 19th century that science switched sides and became the ally of secularization. Two factors prevailed: Scientific materialism became a dominant viewpoint openly hostile to religion (signaled by Feuerbach in Germany and George Combe in England); and the theory of evolution finally retired science from confirming Design. The intricate workings of Nature no longer attested God’s hand, but were understood as having evolved over geologic time.

But this was a recent development. The modern stand-off between science and religion, and stories like Galileo’s struggle with the Church, lead us to imagine that science was always a secularizing force opposed to Christianity, but the opposite was true.

i hope this will help you with anything :)

You might be interested in
You just learned about the ideas of different Enlightenment philosophers. State any two ideas of the philosophers that you consi
Gemiola [76]
There could be any number of answers to this question, since you are allowed to choose on the basic of what you studied.  I'll suggest a couple of prominent examples here, but you should pick what stood out to you from your studies.

In political philosophy, theories on the origins of governmental authority and the structure of governments, as developed by thinkers like Locke, Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Rousseau have had a huge impact on historical developments that followed, contributing to the American Revolution (esp. Locke and Montesquieu) and the French Revolution (also Voltaire and Rousseau).

In ethics, the categorical imperative approach of Immanuel Kant continues to have strong influence on ethical thinking today.  Kant stressed that we need to treat all other rational beings not as means to an end for ourselves, but as ends in themselves, equal to ourselves.  He urged that all actions need to be such that they would be sensible if applied universally to all persons. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By 1935 the proportion of women workers in the USSR’s workforce was in every five.
Katarina [22]
Your answer option B two
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is Dec. 7, 1941 called "a day that will live in infamy"?
trapecia [35]
It was the date of the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the date which FDR asked congress for a declaration of war. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Andrew Jackson second bank of the us
Tasya [4]
Yeah a war commenced and lots of sadness and death happens LOL<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This doesnt have to be answered but " Do you think our society is equal"
krek1111 [17]
Not at all because were too distracted by all these campaigns which only one matters and that’s the “All lives Matter” we need to be a unit.:)
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was he woman from New Orleans reluctant to join the nawsa
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the United States commit most of its resources to the war in Europe?
    7·1 answer
  • how did the need for specialized metals for industtial production, as well as the need for gold, silver, and diamonds, lead to t
    11·1 answer
  • How did thomas edison transform american life
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the British set up universal public education in India?
    14·1 answer
  • Using this excerpt from the code of Hammurabi, what be the punishment for a slave who slapped
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me pretty pleaseeee:(
    13·1 answer
  • Sedimentary rocks formed from bits of rock, plant, and animal remain are
    5·1 answer
  • Can anyone write me an ESSAY on how the Louisiana purchase was made and what was the greatest change that it brought to the Unit
    9·2 answers
  • 90 POINTS PLSSSSS ANSWER ASAP
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!