I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. A strength of naturalistic observation is that it reflects participants' everyday behavior. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.
"<span>The major petroleum strikes that began the rapid growth in petroleum exploration and speculation occurred in </span>Southeast Texas<span>, but soon reserves were found across Texas and wells were constructed in </span>North Texas<span>, </span>East Texas<span>, and the </span>Permian Basin<span> in </span>West Texas<span>. Although limited reserves of oil had been struck during the 19th century, the strike at </span>Spindletop<span> near Beaumont in 1901 gained national attention, spurring exploration and development that continued through the 1920s and beyond. Spindletop and the Joiner strike in East Texas, at the outset of the </span>Great Depression<span>, were the key strikes that launched this era of change in the state."</span>
The desire to perform
behavior effectively for its own sake is called intrinsic motivation. Intrinsic
motivation is being defined as a way of having to engage to activity or a
behavior because of the individual’s feeling of enjoyment or contentment.
Answer:
For Congressional redistricting in 2003.
Explanation:
<em>What are special sessions?</em>
Special session amounts to legislative overtime. If there is a stalemate on some of the key issues in the government, a governor can decide to call for a special session. During special sessions, bills that are discussed should be on governor's agenda. Legislators have a period of 30 days to do their work, and it can be called for at any time.
<em>Texas Redistricting</em>
2003 Texas redistricting is a contraversional state plan for defining new Congresional districts. In 2002 Republicans won the control of the Texas state legislature for the first time in 130 years. Their plan was to work on establishing a majority in the House of Representatives seats from Texas, which was held by their own party. It is said that this redistricting violated the Voting Rights Act and was settled by the Supreme Court of the United States of America in a case called <em>League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry</em> in 2006. The Court ruled that only one District violated the aforementioned act.
