None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Different type of ways....
The southern states!
Please give me brainliest. :)
Answer:
As of 2021, the Republican Party controls all nine state executive offices, both U.S. Senate offices, six of seven representatives to the U.S. House of Representatives, and a majority in the South Carolina General Assembly.
<span>There are "two" morphemes in the word chimps.
A morpheme is the littlest grammatical unit in a dialect. At the end of the day, it is the smallest meaningful unit of a dialect. The field of study committed to morphemes is called morphology. A morpheme isn't identical to a word, and the main difference between the two is that a morpheme might not be seen as alone, though a word, by definition, is freestanding.
</span>
