Answer:
The implication in Lee’s reports that his goals in the Gettysburg campaign were limited, and largely achieved, is at least partly consistent with some modern studies of the campaign. They challenge the traditional view that Gettysburg was a disastrous Confederate defeat that shattered Lee’s hopes for a war-winning victory on Northern soil. They also reject the notion that Gettysburg was a crucial turning point toward ultimate Union victory in the war. According to historians who question these traditional interpretations, Lee’s incursion into Pennsylvania was a raid, not an invasion. A smashing victory over the Army of the Potomac would have been a nice bonus, but it was not the main goal of the raid. The Union victory at Gettysburg was merely defensive, and the Army of Northern Virginia got away with its spoils and lived to fight another day— indeed, many other days, as the war continued for almost two more years. It was only in retrospect and in memory that Gettysburg became the climactic battle and turning point of the war.
Explanation:
Some of these arguments are self-evidently correct. The war did go on for almost two more years, and the Confederacy still had a chance to win it as late as August 1864 by wearing out the Northern will to continue fighting. Rebel foraging parties did scour hundreds of square miles of south-central Pennsylvania for whatever they could find and take—including many African Americans carried back to Virginia into slavery.
Hope this helps : )
George Washington was the first president
A new breed of managers and experts replaced traditional property owners as the leaders of the middle class.
so the first example is taxes, as britain enforced them on sugar and molasses which eventually led to the american revolution. and 2nd example is stationing troops as they issued a series of facts known collectively. this was hard for the colonists as they had difficulty maintaining a force about it, as well as having problems with the timeline of the american revolutuon
Answer: True
Explanation: True. Because the practice of neocolonialism is that the more developed economies try to exert influence in developing countries through economic aid indirectly, creating a state of dependence for their economic, social, political and cultural conditions. Circumstance that is taken advantage of by those powers that see in this new system of colonialism the opportunity to achieve more wealth and to subjugate the countries over which they exert such influence to obtain their own benefit.
