Answer:
From March to June, we can see an increase in positive cases. In March, less than 5000 people gave positive results, almost half of the people recovered, and a small number of people died. During April, there were more recovered people than positive cases, and the deaths descended in contrast with March. In May, there was a considerable increase in the number of positive cases, almost 25000 people were infected and less than half of the infected people recovered, and there were less than 5000 deaths. Lastly, in June, there were 35000 positive cases, 10000 recovers, and a slight increase in deaths, but never superior to 5000.
Explanation:
In this paragraph, we explain the graph. Each sentence describes a month, commenting on the number of deaths, positive cases, and recovers. Besides, there is a comparison with the numbers of the previous months. Also, we can write an introductory sentence where we give a general idea of what we are seeing.
please mark me as brainliest and rate ,thank me please i begg you
Explanation:
The Theory of Hormheb
The king’s deputy, also known as Horemheb, may have also been responsible for the death of King Tut as well. The possibility that King Tut was getting older and probably ready to take powers into his own hands may have contributed to his early demise. For many years it was believed that Hormheb guided King Tut in his royal decisions as a child. As King Tut grew older and became more independent he started making his own decisions without the aid of Horemheb. This new thinking might have upset him and he quickly saw his power fading away. This independence that King Tut was attaining might have upset him and could been the reason as to why he killed King Tut.
Though Horemheb did not get the throne after King Tut’s death he did get it after Ay. Upon becoming the pharaoh he restored Egypt to its traditional tradition which was the worshiping of the many ancient gods. He moved his capital to Memphis and returned all the temples to their rightful priests. During his reign as pharaoh he removed any signs of Akhenaten’s religion.
By his actions, many Egyptologists and historians strongly assume that Horemheb wanted to restore Egypt to its traditional ways. Although, in hindsight, it appears that King Tut was also leaning in the direction of restoring Egypt to the more habitual ways before his death—it might not have been fast enough for Horemheb though.
Mohamed El-Saghir, head of Upper Egyptian Antiquities, believes that Horemheb could not have committed the murder of the pharaoh. Mohamed believes that because King Tut was restoring Egypt to its traditional ways, Horemheb would not have had any reason to kill him. He does find it interesting that Horemheb removed King Tut’s name from several items and replaced it with his. Even so, it’s still not enough evidence and most pharaohs always tried to outdo the pharaohs before them.
<span>Okay, so to make this sentence more interesting we have to add more detail. Watch:
Before:
I am swinging.
After:
I am swinging on my big green porch swing with fluffy cushions, listening to the birds chirping and letting the sun hit my face and warm my entire body as I lean my head back and take a deep breath of air that smells of flowers and fresh cut grass.
<span>Does that make sense?</span></span>
Answer:
They are considered major achievements of Western culture
Explanation:
I just went on quizlet and go the answer
