On my opinion, Lehna’s Narrative is a non-chronological story that starts with a description of his regrets after being sent to prison and it also presents some flashbacks about his life as a young man and how was it like to live in his hometown. Then, Lehna starts to guide the reader and explains what is the story going to be about. After that, he changes the order of events and starts telling the story in a chronological order, first, the reason and the circumstances of his arrest, then the life in prison and at last, the moment he got out and how people treated him as an ex-convict. I consider the story is very effective because he starts telling he was in prison and that catches’ people attention, because he doesn’t clearly explain the reasons, so, as a reader you want to know what really happened and how he manage to live after that.
Your question is incomplete because you have not provided the answer options, which are:
exhibit grace under pressure.
recognize the meaningless of life.
have a mentor to follow.
learn from his mistakes.
Answer:
exhibit grace under pressure.
Explanation:
In the excerpt from Hemingway's "A Farewell to Arms," the narrator makes reference to how soldiers spend their time before an attack. In that respect, he mentions that he is invited to have a drink with the major and other officers in a kind and pleasant atmosphere. Thus, the relaxed and unconcerned moment they have contrasts with the brutality of the attacks, which demonstrates the dignity and amiability of the men in stressful times.
Answer:
poggers
Explanation:
forsen turn the lights on if forsen sees this we won zululu
Answer:
travel where ? im confused
The interaction between Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier establishes the central focus as it moves from a small disagreement between the couple to an argument and silence between the two.
Through questions like yours, it is possible to discover that your question refers to the text that is attached in the figure below.
By reading this text, we can see that:
- The interaction between Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier has, as its main focus, the disagreement between them.
- This disagreement starts with a small discomfort, where Mr. Pontellier wants to talk to his wife, but she is uninterested.
- This disagreement then turns into an argument where Mr. Pontellier accuses his wife of negligence and of being a bad and inattentive mother.
- The argument shakes Mrs. Pontillier and she decides not to respond and causes an uncomfortable silence between herself and her husband.
With this, we can see that the couple has difficulties to live peacefully with each other.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23606786?referrer=searchResults
