All of the above but in terms of United States government and History the answer is C.) Unconstitutional.
You didn’t give us options..?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Former colonies threw off many aspects of colonial rule, but they have kept the essential elements of the state. New states in former colonies were fundamentally different than the experiences of older states in that <em>the new states were trying to develop state institutions with not as much resources than previous states did and in less time.</em>
For instance, the first example was the House of Burgesses in the colony of Virginia. It was the first intent of Virginians to have their own legislative body to create its own laws, trying to get some independence from the British monarchy.
Answer:
C. Lack of a bill of rights in the new constitution is problematic is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Anti Federalists were the politicians who were against the US constitution which was adopted in 1787. They considered the constitution to be giving too much power to the central government and they were afraid of giving too much power to single national government as the government could infringe upon the rights of citizens and states. Patrick Henry, James Winthrop and George Mason were some of the famous Anti federalists. They were afraid of the new constitution because the states were given more power in Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union while it wasn't so in the new constitution. Their influence led to the passage of bill of rights. They wanted to establish a weak Central government as was in Articles of Confederation and wanted for strong central governments.
I'm very sorry to hear that. I know we don't anything about each other, but if you need to talk to someone, I am free...
