Explanation:
Answer: Citizens participation as a means of achieving social change is considered as one of the most impactful way these days. People in a democratic state have enough rights and voice that any concern or change with enough rights are considered as impactful.
Answer:
but statistically speaking, they do not make them any more often than adults do
Explanation:
Labor Contract, Shelby County, Tennessee, 1866 Records of the Assistant Commissioner for the State of Tennessee, Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, 1865-1869, No. M-999. The excerpt above would best serve as evidence of which of the following?
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Concerning the excerpt above and the available options, the correct answer is
"The social and economic continuities that characterized the antebellum and post-Civil War South"
This is because the listed titles, organizations, and names were prominent during the antebellum years which was the period between the 1812 wars and the American civil wars, including its aftermath effects on the Southern United States.
Answer:
for number 1 do what it says and you shouldnt have a problem, number 2 a corset is a piece of fabric that sits above your hips. you can fighten it as much as you can to where you can still breath. it makes your waiste smaller
Answer:
Federalist Papers to help people to understand the US Constitution.
Explanation:
There are 85 essays in Federalist Papers which were printed in New York newspapers while New York State was deciding whether or not to support the U.S. Constitution. These are a series of eighty-five letters written to newspapers in 1787-1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, urging ratification of the Constitution Other newspapers outside New York also published the essays as other states were deciding to ratify the Constitution. In 1788, the papers were published together in a book called The Federalist. As of today, the people still read the Federalist Papers to help them understand the Constitution.
Hamilton, who wrote about two-thirds of the essays has addressed the objections of opponents, who feared a tyrannical central government that would supersede states’ rights and encroach on individual liberties. All strong nationalists, the essayists argued that, most important, the proposed system would preserve the Union, now in danger of breaking apart, and empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest. Conflicting economic and political interests would be reconciled through a representative Congress, whose legislation would be subject to presidential veto and judicial review.
