a.) The status of the empires was very unstable and had a low status because they were struggling to unify Christendom under the Pope. The Mongols on the other hand conquered a lot of land in a short amount of time. This might have influenced Well’s conclusion that the Mongols’ conquests were without parallel.
b.) One example of the creation of a new imperial state was that the Mongols rose suddenly and very quickly dominated other countries. The Mongols had conquests that took land very quickly and they were big events. In conclusion, this shows that Well’s claim is well supported by the Mongols.
c.) One piece of evidence of the Mongol khanates that supports Well’s description is the Golden Horde Khanate. While the Mongols were invading Russia, Russia decided to just help the Mongols based on the Mongols past and what they did to other countries. This supports Well’s description by bringing a number of Turkish tribes into a military confederacy.
A. The empires at this time had a fairly low status as they were unable to unify under Christendom and the Pope. Even with all the land the European nations owned the Mongols captured a greater area in far less time. This could have influenced Well's decision on saying it was without parallel.
C. The Golden Horde Mongol khanate is a good way to support Wells' description. The Mongols had invaded Russia and they bowed down and decided to help them. The Russians had seen what they were doing to other countries and decided they would gain more from just assisting the Mongols instead of trying to fight them off.
I apologize for not having an answer to part B, I couldn't figure that out myself.
The first and main way was that they tried to eliminate collusion between business in order to pave the way for competition. Another was that they tried to eliminated corruption by making business transactions more apparent. It is considered true that these actions failed overall, but they did bring attention to the subject.
Such was the fate for the relationship between Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft. Roosevelt's decision to challenge Taft for the Republican nomination in 1912 was most difficult. Historians disagree on his motives. Defenders of Roosevelt insist that Taft betrayed the progressive platform.