Answer:The cost of capital that will make both investments equal is 17.045%
Explanation:
Investment A
$1.5 million will be received in perpetuity we can there use perpetuity formula to Value investment A.
Value of Investment A = 1500 000/r
Investment B
$1.2 Million will be received in Investment B with a growth rate of 3% will then use Gordon's growth rate model to value investment B.
Value of investment B = (1200 000 x (1+0.03))/(r - 0.03)
Value of investment B = 1236000/(r - 0.03)
1500 000/r = 1236000/(r - 0.03)
1236000(r) = 1500000(r - 0.03)
(r - 0.03) = 1236000( r)/1500000
r - 0.03 = 0.824r
r - 0.824r = 0.03 = 0.176r = 0.03
r = 0.03/0.176 = 0.170454545
R = 17.045%
The cost of capital that will make both investments to be equal is 17.045%
Explanation:
Disruptive technology, new business ventures, and increased availability of data are quickly changing traditional financial reporting and assurance processes. As a result, prospective auditors not only need to understand fundamental auditing concepts, but also need to anticipate the influence that disruptive technology will have on the profession. The following case study provides a lens through which prospective auditors can view the coming changes to the profession by asking them to consider how the online lending company, Kabbage, is currently disrupting the lending industry for non-traditional and small businesses. Students contemplate several fundamental auditing concepts such as audit evidence, financial statement assertions, and analytical procedures while also acquiring insight into the effects that new and disruptive technology will have on the profession. The intention is to encourage students to embrace coming changes and become lifetime learners.
Answer: 12400
Explanation:
It should be noted that 50% of the stick value will be paid by the customer and also 100% of the mutual fund shares value will also be paid because they are nonmarginable securities.
Therefore, 50% of $12,000 = $6,000
Total payment required will now be:
= $6,000 + $2,400 + $4,000
= $12,400.
Answer: Option b
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to an arrangement under which one entity allows the other entity to use its procedures and brand name for the business in return of any loyalty or other such benefits.
In the given case, Gerald wants to operate his business globally and not eager to control all of it.
Hence from the above we can conclude that franchising is the best option for Gerald.