1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scrat [10]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against Japan in 1945? Using the bomb would destr

oy the armaments still available to Japanese forces in Japan. Using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the United States to the entire world. Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. Using the bomb would enable Allied forces to invade and take over the Japanese mainland
History
2 answers:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
3 0

B.

Using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the United States to the entire world.

erastova [34]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is C) Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops.

The argument that decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against Japan in 1945 was "Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops."

Although the decision could be controversial for the deaths it caused, the US military and the US government decided that this was the best decision because they did not want more US and Allies soldiers lost in battle and the bombing meant to end the war quickly. So US President Harry Truman dropped the bomb over Hiroshima on Agust 6, 1945 and over Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

You might be interested in
Facts about Melville bissell
S_A_V [24]
He invented the carpet sweeper
3 0
3 years ago
When you contrast two historical documents, what do you look for?
larisa [96]

Answer:

I think what each document days about that time in history

3 0
2 years ago
What do historians hope to achieve when they make historical arguments?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

they wan to acheive what they want to find out and they also wan to acheive what actually happedned

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How were civilians affected by the siege of Vicksburg?
Schach [20]

Answer:

Civilians were affected by the Siege of Vicksburg because Grant cut off the city by land and Farragut cut off the city by water.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ASAP <br> what was the Harappa/Mohenjo-Daro society like?
Dmitrij [34]

Explanation: It was one of the largest cities of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization, also known as the Harappan Civilization, which developed around 3,000 BCE from the prehistoric Indus culture. ... Mohenjo-daro was the most advanced city of its time, with remarkably sophisticated civil engineering and urban planning.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about freedom of religion is correct?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was Nelson Mandela?
    10·2 answers
  • What factors made the Industrial Revolution possible around the world?
    11·2 answers
  • 4. Who controlled the Byzantine church?
    7·2 answers
  • What is O'Sullivan's vision for America with the idea of America being a "City set on a hill."
    6·1 answer
  • The colonists brought horses to the New World. Which answer best explains how horses affected the Native Americans? They feared
    12·1 answer
  • What type of resistance did activist use during the 50’s &amp; 60’s to promote equality? Please Elaborate on your answer.
    5·1 answer
  • What the name of all the oceans in the world​
    11·1 answer
  • Que fue lo que alentó a portugueses y españoles a explorar nuevas rutas marítimas
    13·1 answer
  • How would you summarize eisenhower's approach to Latin America?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!