1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scrat [10]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against Japan in 1945? Using the bomb would destr

oy the armaments still available to Japanese forces in Japan. Using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the United States to the entire world. Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. Using the bomb would enable Allied forces to invade and take over the Japanese mainland
History
2 answers:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
3 0

B.

Using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the United States to the entire world.

erastova [34]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is C) Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops.

The argument that decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against Japan in 1945 was "Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops."

Although the decision could be controversial for the deaths it caused, the US military and the US government decided that this was the best decision because they did not want more US and Allies soldiers lost in battle and the bombing meant to end the war quickly. So US President Harry Truman dropped the bomb over Hiroshima on Agust 6, 1945 and over Nagasaki on August 9, 1945.

You might be interested in
Don't break the chain
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer: what chain?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors can directly affect supply? Check all that apply.
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

competition and substitute goods.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Louisiana have to lose if the Union was to abolish slavery?
Bumek [7]

Answer:

Louisiana faced to lose a large part of their economy if slavery was to be abolished. This would force the majority of the goods in Louisiana to become more expensive due to the need to pay labor.

Explanation:

3 0
1 year ago
What happens when three-fourths of the states ratify an amendment?
saul85 [17]

The amendment becomes part of the Constitution when it has been ratified by three-fourths (currently 38) of the states. This process has been used for ratification of every amendment to the Constitution thus far. Article V also provides for an alternative process, which has never been utilized.

3 0
2 years ago
Why is it important we can change the constitution
juin [17]

so the world can be a better place, it's different now

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who does Hitler blame for Germany's problems? What does he do to "fix it"?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Warren G. Harding bet the entire White House China Set on a hand of cards.
    12·1 answer
  • What method was used to decide what type of state the New Mexico and Utah territories would become?
    8·1 answer
  • We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide pr
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the stalin able to establish suck a strong communist presence in Eastern Europe following ww2
    10·1 answer
  • How did the number of new immigrants around the turn of the twentieth century affect the number of acculturation
    10·1 answer
  • Need help please help me I don’t wanna fail
    15·1 answer
  • What were the causes and effects of the Bozeman trail
    5·1 answer
  • The last Europeans to arrive in the Good Coast was​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!