A
potential ethical concern that may result from the ruling stated above
is:
<span>d. patients who cannot afford to purchase bone marrow will have to wait for voluntary donors.</span>
By
the time supply is not enough to address the high demand; some donors will find
all means to provide the best deal they think will benefit them the most. On
the other hand, the patients will be forced to buy the needed bone marrow as emergency
needs arise. Therefore, rich patients can secure a donor immediately while poor patients will still have to wait for a voluntary donor since priority is set to those to have the money not to those who are in need of it so badly.
I think the best answer from the choices listed above is option D. A valid scientific claim is best described by the statement "<span>The claim is supported by at least ten scientists in addition to the original researcher</span>". This is because this claim is being supported by a number of experts in that certain field.
Answer:
i dont know what thats means
Explanation:
but i gues thx for the points
