Answer:
Pro: Getting your voice heard, and swaying the public opinion about the war efforts.
Con: Decrease the morale of the soldiers who are already stationed, if the protest is negative, and the government may keep an eye on you as well.
Explanation:
When it comes to protesting against a war that is already ongoing, it could go either way, as to whether or not the protest would have the intended impact. If the war has been going for a long time and there isn't exactly a clear reason as to why it is still going on, public opinion tend to be more sympathetic - for example: Vietnam War protests. However, just like during the Vietnam War, it can damage the morale of the soldiers who are already there and as history has proven, the government might put you on the list of people-to-watch - just like past celebrities who have protested against the Vietnam War such as Jane Fonda.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
First, a representative sponsors a bill. ... If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill.
<span>C. a worker in a unionized auto factory.</span>
Answer:
Response to intervention
Explanation:
Response to intervention (RTI) is a strategy that is used by professionals to the children or students who faced a problem in learning some skills. They help students so they can get success in the classroom. This strategy is just not used on special children, it can be used by a teacher to help their students if they are facing some form in the classroom.
teacher can use the test to measure the progress of a child. This is introduced by the disability act in 2004. The team of RTI will seek the disability in a child and help them to improve in that specific area. This strategy has been used even then when a child has no learning disability in the classroom.
A difficulty facing those who plan and review behavioral studies is the risk of harm of the subject. They believe that it can affect negatively on the physical and emotional aspect of the subject.
However, in behavioral and social science, physical and emotional harm is unlikely. The only purpose of experiments is to observe people's behavior. Most of the time, subjects do not know that they are part of an experiment because if they do know about it, they will probably change their behavior. They will only be informed as soon as the experiment is over. The results of social experiments and research will become insignificant and unreliable if subjects are aware beforehand.
