Original jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court is the venue where the issues and merits of a case heard for the first time.
The Supreme Court is given original and appellate jurisdiction, according to the Constitution. Original jurisdiction refers to a case being heard by the Supreme Court as the first and only time. The Constitution only grants original jurisdiction in matters involving conflicts between states or between ambassadors and other senior ministers.
Having appellate jurisdiction gives the Court the power to examine rulings from subordinate courts. Appeals from lower courts make up the majority of the cases the Supreme Court reviews.
To learn more about Supreme Court visit brainly.com/question/10739091?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
a) Based on your understanding of critical thinking and memory, describe one flaw in Bruce's reasoning.
I consider that the problem Brice has is biased. It is not the professor's fault. The exam is well designed. The issue is the way Bruce is studying. Bruce can read four or five more times the questions, but if he does not understand the questions, the answers will never be correct. If he is not understanding, what he memorizes won't be correct.
B) Describe two possible explanations for Bruce's average performance.
Number one, he is not getting the right ideas of the question. If he is just memorizing the concepts, his brain maybe is not getting enough time to remember them at the moment of the examination.
The other issue is that he could believe that what he is understanding is correct, but his knowledge is limited to what he thinks is correct. This does not mean that he indeed has the right answers.
Venture capitalists are looking to get their investment back, even if it’s not in the form of traditional loan repayment. You need to be able to prove a high company valuation in the early stages of your business, which can be a real challenge when you haven’t gotten off the ground yet.
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to "save all that wasted tuition money"
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why answer choice "C. A high school math teacher who encouraged his own son to skip college and focus on learning a trade to 'save all that wasted tuition money'" would be the correct answer because the high school teacher would have a "cognitive dissonance" in his response.
Cognitive dissonance is is having 2 or multiple beliefs in a topic, in this case, the high school teacher would have 2 beliefs in the topic of higher education.
The high school teacher believes that higher education is very important and that people need to get a higher education, but he tells his own son that the tuition that is going into college is "wasted money." This shows that the high school teacher has cognitive dissonance because he has two different beliefs. He believes that higher education is very important, but doesn't want his own son to pursue it because of the tuition costs.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
Response bias goes toward the 3rd one and question wording goes to the 2nd
