Answer:
Hello! Your answer is, B)The overall lesson learned from a text
Explanation:
Hope I helped! Ask me anything if you have any questions! Brainiest plz. Hope you make an 100% and have a nice day! -Amelia♥
Answer:
It raises the important question of how, and if, technology should be monitored and regulated. While there are risks and drawbacks to developing the Flying Machine, the contraption also creates a lot of beauty and releases it into the world.
Explanation: Bradbury's story introduces the concept of weighing the rewards and drawbacks of technology, as well as the negative sides of censorship, which in this case result in the death of the inventor of the Flying Machine. We rarely hear of the invention process being stopped because of negative externalities. Should that be reported and talked about more often? These are ideas that Bradbury would like for us to debate.
Herea are the inferences to each of the excerpts:
1. The narrator has plotted his revenge in secret.
2. Luchesi does not know wines as well as Fortunato.
3. The narrator wants to convince Fortunato to leave the vaults.
4. Fortunato likes the Montresor family motto.
5. The narrator and Fortunato are worried about the late hour.
I am pretty sure that the correct inference of the given passage from "The Cask of Amontillado" is the option : The narrator will make sure Fortunato is comfortable in the vaults. I consider this option as a correct one because Fortunato was killed by <span>Montrasor in this story. Do hope it will help!</span>
Frankenstein starts studying what was chemestry those days.He needed to know more about the functions of the tissues and the connections they had to the human body and the brain.When he goes to university he seems to be eager to learn more about sciences yet not revealed to men.He thought he was going to be able to find certain answers to questions about life and death but his professors objected to ideas which seemed unnatural for them or related to dark sciences they did not teach at such an institution.
His future destiny at university was decided when he found one of his professors with his same interest but not with his obssession. His course of scientific study will lead him to his own ruin, he cannot stop. He is too much into studying something which is a mistery to others who seek knowledge too.Krempe and Waldman are different because they did not have this hubger for knowledge, this craze for for acquiring answers about questions not yet asked in any science up to those days.
