Answer:
No they are not equivalent
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, based on the given rewritten reaction:
The stoichiometry leads to the following theoretical moles of oxygen:
As sodium and hydrogen as a 2 to 1 molar relationship.
Step-by-step explanation:
The requirement is that every element in the domain must be connected to one - and one only - element in the codomain.
A classic visualization consists of two sets, filled with dots. Each dot in the domain must be the start of an arrow, pointing to a dot in the codomain.
So, the two things can't can't happen is that you don't have any arrow starting from a point in the domain, i.e. the function is not defined for that element, or that multiple arrows start from the same points.
But as long as an arrow start from each element in the domain, you have a function. It may happen that two different arrow point to the same element in the codomain - that's ok, the relation is still a function, but it's not injective; or it can happen that some points in the codomain aren't pointed by any arrow - you still have a function, except it's not surjective.
Answer:
Midpoint = (3.5, 4.5)
Perpendicular bisector = y = 
x + 
Step-by-step explanation:
[] We can solve this using the midpoint formula:
-> See attached
[] Plug-in our coordinates and solve:
[] Now we will find the slope to solve for the perpendicular bisector.
-> We will use slope-intercept form, see attached
-> The slopes of two perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other, so will be the slope of or perpendicular bisector
-> Now we can solve for the equation by using y – y1 = m ( x – x1), were y1 and x1 are the coordinates of our midpoint
y - 4.5 = (x-3.5)
y - 4.5 = x-
y = x- + 4.5
y = x +
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
- Heather
