Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The Coase theorem states that when transaction cost are low, two parties will be able to bargain and reach an efficient outcome in the presence of an externality.
The Coase Theorem also states that when conflicting property rights occur, bargaining between the parties involved will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of which party is ultimately awarded the property rights, as long as the transaction costs associated with bargaining are negligible. If trade in an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
Answer:Chicago built its first rail connection in 1848 to connect the Windy City with the lead mines of galena Illinois
Explanation:hope that helps
Answer:
D. She later changed her mind about the women's rights movement and fought against women obtaining the vote.
Explanation:
Elizabeth married Henry Brewster Stanton, had children, she also had a close connection with Susan B. Anthony, and she was also a driving force behind the Seneca Falls Convention. But she never once in her history changed her mind about the fairness of women's right to vote. She always contributed onto it.
(I'm 80% sure of that)
not perfect tho lol
That statement is true
Scientific pursuits give humans more capabilities in understanding the universe. From finding out the history on how certain objects or phenomenon happened on how to utilize things/resources that available in the environment for our benefit
