The correct answer is: equal treatment cannot exist in separate facilities.
Brown v. Board of Education is a case in which the Supreme Court ruled that there shouldn't be racial segregation in schools in the United States. A previous ruling (<em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em>) would state that "separate but equal" was a valid policy.
The Brown case came to disregard this thought and validate the idea that there's no such thing as an equal treatment if there are separate facilities.
Answer:
I believe that it is unconstitutional
Explanation:
n a 6-1 decision known as Engel v. Vitale, the Supreme Court ruled that the prayer was unconstitutional as a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment. Justice Hugo Black delivered the opinion of the court. In the following excerpt he first gives the background to this case, noting the contents of the prayer and the resulting lawsuit. He then explains that the Court agrees with the petitioners that this prayer is unconstitutional because it was composed by government officials to promote religious beliefs. Black claims that even though the prayer is nondenominational and voluntary, it still involves indirect coercion because the government is behind it. Black was a Supreme Court associate justice from 1937 to 1971, where he was known as a defender of civil liberties. Prior to serving on the Court he was a lawyer and a U.S. senator.
Answer:
They learned the Five Pillars of Islam. They fasted, worshipped in mosques, and went on pilgrimages.
Explanation: Timbuktu became a center of learning with many universities. ...
Local schools were set up where children could learn the Qur'an.
Answer:
oral and in writing to be enforceable
Explanation:
An agreement that is writing and signed by both parties makes it binding on both of them hence it is enforceable by the law. So an agreement to seek an interest in real estate must be put down in writing also so that it can be enforceable by the law should problem arise.
Answer:
Limiting freedom of speech can cause rebellion amongst citizens.
Explanation:
When the government or any other institution tries to limit a person's freedom of speech it can cause significant issues. This is especially true if the person's speech is trying to bring to light a social, legal, or economic problem within a country.
For example, if the US government passed a law that was wildly unpopular and limited the speech of people who protested against it, it would cause even more problems within the US. This is due to the fact that the government is trying to control what people say and how they feel.
