Answer:
B-False
Explanation:
After the retrospective discussion all the improvement items discussed are placed in the Product Backlog. To ensure continuous improvement, the next sprint backlog ( & not the current one) should include at least one high priority process improvement which was identified in the previous Sprint Retrospective meeting.
Answer:
Using LIFO:
TOTAL Sales : $19,875,500
COGS = $11,021,250
GROSS PROFIT = $8,853,750
Explanation:
KINDLY CHECK ATTACHED PICTURE
Answer:
Option c is correct
$245,680
Explanation:
The total manufacturing cost = $737,040.
Units produced = 22,200
Cost per unit before adjustment for absorbed overhead=
=$737,040./22,200 units
=$33.2 per unit
Cost of goods sold before adjustment for overheads
= (cost per unit × units sold)
= $33.2 × 7,400
= $245,680
Answer:
it might be B but I'm not sure
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.
For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.
Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.
