The correct answer would be, Reverse Discrimination.
Recently, businesses have experienced debate over Reverse Discrimination, the practice of discriminating against a dominant or majority group of persons.
Explanation:
When people or group of people who were discriminated against previously, are being favored, then this practice is known as the Reverse Discrimination.
For example, reverse discrimination can be caused in an organization where previously discriminated Muslims are now being preferred and hired by the company.
Similarly the same practice can be seen in the companies where females are now being hired(even though the males are more qualified for the job) who were previously discriminated against men.
Reverse Discrimination is not a fair practice, because it is still a Discrimination.
Learn more about Reverse Discrimination at:
brainly.com/question/8562925
#LearnWithBrainly
is the total implied increase in economic spending activity from a government stimulus of 
billion
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The median product preference tests the increase in expenditure due to changes in availability.
In increasing government expenditure, total economic investment would be increased by the scale of the budget multiplier. In other terms, the expenditure equation indicates how much GDP can increase as government expenditure increases.
The spending multiplier can be expressed as 
So, the total implied increase in economic spending is 
In economics, marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is the proportion of an aggregate raise in pay that consumer spends on the consumption of services and goods, as opposed to saving it.
The most frequently employed technique of workers was the STRIKE. Withholding labor from management would, in theory, force the company to suffer great enough financial losses that they would agree to worker terms. Strikes have been known in America since the colonial age, but their numbers grew larger in the Gilded Age.
Answer:
1.763
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Beta of $40 million portfolio = 1
Risk-free rate = 4.25%
Market risk premium = 6.00%
Expected return = 13.00%
Now,
Expected return = Risk-free rate + ( Beta × Market risk premium )
13.00% = 4.25% + ( Beta × 6.00% )
or
Beta × 6.00% = 8.75%
or
Beta = 1.458
Now,
Beta of the total profile should be equal to 1.458
Thus,
Weight of $40 million portfolio = $40 million ÷ [ $40 million + $60 million]
= 0.4
Weight of $60 million portfolio = $60 million ÷ [ $40 million + $60 million]
= 0.6
therefore,
the average beta
1.458 = 0.4 × 1 + 0.6 × ( Beta of $60 million portfolio )
or
1.058 = 0.6 × ( Beta of $60 million portfolio )
or
Beta of $60 million portfolio = 1.763
