Answer:
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
Explanation:
They know an eyewitness will be free of personal bias. - This is not correct. Eyewitness reports of historical events will most likely be very much based on personal bias. Eyewitness reports will vary according to the cultural background of the person, where they were during events, their emotional state and stance towards the events, their background knowledge, their participation in the events, and many more.
They know a student who did research will be an accurate source. - This is not true. Historians can’t assume the student research will be the accurate source as students are only learning to do proper research and are expected to still make mistakes.
<u>They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. - This is the correct answer. When starting work, historians assume that experts who did research and examinations before them, and who put down information, are giving accurate accounts.</u> For example, if a historian’s work is based on the material artifact, he or she will assume that the archeologist before them made the best possible account into the explanation and background of the artifact.
They know an eyewitness report will always be truthful. - This is not true. As mentioned before, eyewitness reports are highly subjective, and therefore cannot be taken as true scientific findings.
George Orwell's "Shooting an Elephant" features the ironic theme that, as Orwellwrites, "when the white man turns tyrant, it is his own freedom that he destroys." This issituational irony, which occurs when an action has unintended consequences that are the opposite of what was expected or desired.
brainly.com/question/2082568#readmore
The narrator’s knowledge and understanding.
Answer:
The police were not fair.
Explanation:
Edward Coolidge was being accused of murdering a 14-year-old girl. He was the last person the girl was seen with and with whom she kept in touch before being found dead, stabbed and with gunshot marks on her body. How Coolidge was the prime suspect in the crime.
The police needed to go to Coolidge's house to search and seize his car and other objects that could be used in the investigation, for that, the police needed a search and seizure warrant. Who signed the search and seizure mandate was the Attorney General of the case and for that reason, the arrival of the police at Coolidge's home was not fair and violates the fourth institutional amendment.
This is because, for a term to be valid, it must be issued by someone who holds an impartial position in the case investigated.
The best example of a vivid sensory detail is B. “which confined me to the house for the afternoon as well as the forenoon”
This is shown as the description is vivid as it talks about the confinement of the narrator in the house and also in the forenoon as the readers are able to use their senses to create imagery.
<h3>What is a Sensory Detail?</h3>
This refers to the use of the five senses when narrating a story to an audience to make it more vivid and captivating.
Hence, we can see that the best example of a vivid sensory detail is B. “which confined me to the house for the afternoon as well as the forenoon”
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.
Read more about sensory details here:
brainly.com/question/2193708
#SPJ1
