This would be an example of "chronological history", since the evens are being "placed" in the order in which they occurred. This is often helpful to understand "cause and effect" relationships.
Back then, the answer would be A. But, if this was a MODERN question, the answer would be D.
I don’t understand what you’re saying ?
Answer:
The united states does not participate in political assassinations but yes the U.S should assassinate suspected terrorist because it already does.
Explanation:
The form for this is often an air strike or a black ops in a counter- terrorism operation.
Answer:
The amendment process is very difficult and time consuming: A proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress, then ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. The ERA Amendment did not pass the necessary majority of state legislatures in the 1980s. Another option to start the amendment process is that two-thirds of the state legislatures could ask Congress to call a Constitutional Convention.
A new Constitutional Convention has never happened, but the idea has its backers. A retired federal judge, Malcolm R. Wilkey, called a few years ago for a new convention. "The Constitution has been corrupted by the system which has led to gridlock, too much influence by interest groups, and members of Congress who focus excessively on getting reelected," Wilkey said in a published series of lectures.
Hope this helps... maybe brainliest??