Anti-federalists opposed ratification of the constitution until they were assured that ?

2 answers:

6 0

Anti-federalists opposed ratification of the constitution until they were assured that it would not interfere with the natural rights of citizens, which is why they insisted on there being a "Bill of Rights" that explicitly protected these basic rights.

kiruha [24]3 years ago

3 0

Anti-Federalists opposed ratification of the Constitution until they were assured that individual rights would be guaranteed by a bill of rights.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states. Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA. They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification. The US Constitution was ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

You might be interested in

What conclusions can be drawn about George Washington’s effectiveness as a leader, based on his experiences before the presidenc

Lilit [14]

Answer:

George Washington helped shape the office's future role and powers. he also set both formal and informal precedents for future presidents. Washington believed that it was necessary to strike a delicate balance between making the presidency powerful enough to function effectively in a national government, while also avoiding any image of establishing a monarchy or dictatorship.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Which of the following best describes the structure of Hinduism?

andrew-mc [135]

Answer:

Explanation:

because Hinduism is a belifs practiced through strictly outlined steps and rituals. Hinduism is a belifs which people follow the belifs in such a coral manner like for eg discrimination among cast ,making women follow lots of unhealthy behaviour .such practice is strictly belive .

5 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast Direct Democracy and Representative Democracy

irinina [24]

Answer:

Representative democracy is a form of democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives as opposed to a direct democracy, a form of democracy in which people vote on policy initiatives directly.

In a representative democracy, people elect representatives to make political decisions and pass laws for them. In a direct democracy, people make all political decisions and pass laws themselves

<h2><em>PLS MARK ME </em><u><em>BRAINLIEST</em></u></h2>

6 0

2 years ago

Which statement best explains why ancient Egypt is considered a theocracy?

katen-ka-za [31]

Well the term theocracy means a system of government where priests rule in the name of god, so your answer would be the second. Priests were part of the ruling class.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why were the native american allies with the french

Ivenika [448]

The Native Americans helped the French. The English were stealing the Native American's land and the Native American's felt that wasn't fair so they put their efforts and trust in the French. That is why it was called the French and Indian War because the French and the the Indians were allies and they fought together.

4 0

3 years ago