I think number 2 is correct im not sure .. but lmk if im wrong
A Ghetto, was the location were Jews during the WW2 were marginated, as the expression of an anti-semitic racial policy of Adolf Hitler that became institutionalized.
Most of the Ghettos were established all over Germany, Poland, parts of France. There the conditions for a living were extremely bad: they lacked the most essential things for a living. Many didn't have good energy and water supply. The security of the neighborhood is also compromised. Many unrest can happen and there is little to be done as authorities will not care. As leaving a Ghetto was illegal, the people escaping them were systematically executed.
Perhaps the most representative Ghetto is the nowadays Warsaw Ghetto, that serves as museum and memorial for Nazi crimes against humanity. This Ghetto once had almost half a million people living on it.
Below you can see how many Ghettos mostly in East Europe were later transformed into Death Camps:
The elements that William Hogarth depictrd with inaccurate perspective in the engraving includes:
- woman handing a candle
- sheep lined up
- bird perched on a tree
- sign showing the moon
<h3>What is William Hogarth known for?</h3>
He is known for his series paintings based on the modern moral subjects which are sold as engravings on subscription.
On his 1754 engraving, the painting depicted a woman handing a candle to a man outside her window, sheep lined up and walking away, bird perched on a tree and a sign showing the moon hanging from the building.
Read more about William Hogarth
<em>brainly.com/question/18843793</em>
Some of the arguments used to support US expansion and manifest destiny were: European examples, new markets and access to vast natural resources. Because of the US massive industrial expansion and production, US industries needed new markets to sell their goods to and they need access to more natural resources to ensure the continued production. The US expanded its inluences into Alaska, the Pacific (Hawaii, Samoa, Guam, and the Philippines), Latin America and Asia (China and Japan)
<u>Effects of laissez-faire capitalism:</u>
- Laissez-faire capitalism allows companies to compete freely with each other in an open marketplace.
- Without costs of government regulation, businesses can grow faster.
- This leads to price increases for the consumer and the lack of diversification in the marketplace.
- Without restrictions from the government, there is more incentive for innovation, and technological advances can take place.
- This can result in a large wealth gap in a society with a few very rich people in control of the majority of the economy's wealth.
- Capitalism (or laissez faire) feeds and clothes and houses more people at higher levels than any other system.
- Workers have more rights, and have a comfortable work environment.
- Lots of government involvement and regulation raises cost and slows growth.
