Answer:
the capital moved to the Potomac River
Explanation:
i have no explanation
Answer:
To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful.
The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's.
Explanation:
On Edge 2020.
Answer: A positive impact that the development of canals in the U.S is B!
Explanation:
The canals allowed more ways to travel through some land to expand and secure more trades in the west !
Answer:
Leif traveled, explored, and sailed to Norway, where King Olaf I converted him to Christianity. Leif was originally from Icelandic Commonwealth which was the state existing in Iceland between the establishment of the Alþingi in 930 and the pledge of fealty to the Norwegian king with the Old Covenant in 1262.
Explanation:
hope this helps <3
Answer:
The large number of groups could lead to ethnic tensions.
Explanation:
