1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scZoUnD [109]
3 years ago
7

What is a proximal cause for why a small group of spaniards was able to conquer the inca empire?

History
1 answer:
True [87]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The Spaniards had more historical war experiences, weapons, and horses
</span>
 this was opposed to the locals Incas who had inferior weapons, less experience in wars and had no horses. The Spaniards came with sophisticated weaponry, which also included the use of small pox to decimate the population.
<span />
You might be interested in
The United Nations helped hundreds of thousands of World War II orphans.<br> True or<br> False
Anna [14]

Answer:

True. UN did help thousands of orphans and non orphans as well. Anyone affected by the war was helped.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement summarizes Columbus’ voyage to the Western Hemisphere?
Natalija [7]

The correct answer is C. Columbus was given money by Spain after he proposed that they go go around Africa to go to India since the world was round.

6 0
3 years ago
Were the manchus a strong or weak dynasty?
Allisa [31]
Strong because they had many territories and had a control over China
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who killed Bahlol Khan​
Elenna [48]

someone known as PRATAP killed him :)

7 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What effect does the use of words with strong positive<br> connotations have on this excerpt
    6·1 answer
  • How did the development of cities affect human beings
    12·1 answer
  • What were the two major causes of the Dust Bowl during the early 1930s
    11·1 answer
  • The Greeks who adopted the mystery religions believed that a defiance of Fate was
    13·2 answers
  • List the top four Members of the North Atlantic treaty organization(NATO)
    8·2 answers
  • What might have happened if they didn't agree to the Mayflower Compact?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the general situation in postwar America?
    13·2 answers
  • Which two European countries occupied Uruguay?<br> Spain<br> Holland<br> England<br> Portugal
    8·2 answers
  • Which ocean is labeled #1? Atlantic Pacific Arctic Southern​
    10·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of a "coup d'etat
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!