The <u>supplier</u> (noun) <u>accidentally</u>(Adv.) <u>delivered</u> (verb) the <u>wrong</u>(Adj.) <u>material</u>(noun).
Here,
- <u>accidentally</u> is the adverb
- <u>supplier, material</u> are the nouns
- <u>wrong </u>is the adjective
- <u>delieverd</u> is the verb
- <u>supplier</u> is the direct object
- <u>material</u> is the indirect object
- <u>supplier </u>is the subject
To learn more about subject and verb, adjectives , articles , adverbs, direct objects , and indirect objects
brainly.com/question/1569536
#SPJ4
I think the correct answer would be C. The best summary of the text "Save the Coral Reefs" would be
Construction along the coasts, overfishing, and bleaching have seriously damaged the world’s coral reefs. Since reefs are a very important part of the ocean’s ecosystem, their destruction has a devastating environmental impact, and we must work to protect them.
Coral reefs are known to be very fragile which are made of limestone. People who would build coastal regions and those who overfish should be stopped as these activities ruin and damage the corals which would ruin the habitat of the fishes and other aquatic organisms.
Robert Frost's poem has the structure of a lyric poem. If you think about it, this poem could be put to some music and be sung, just like song lyrics.
Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
