Congress passed a serious of neutrality acts in the late 1930’s
After World War l the United States stuck with a strict policy of isolationism. The American people didn’t want to be involved in European affairs. Accepting the refugees would’ve been a way for the U.S. to get dragged into the war. We see in the later years after the Imperial Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor where isolationism in the States becomes a distant memory and where the U.S. begins taking position on the world stage.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "implementation of the English Bill of Rights," since this put "checks" on the monarchy especially when it came to taxation. </span></span>
It depends who it is say a baby, a kiss on the cheek,A old man shake hand or any proper interductions i answer YES
The Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, and less power to the states.
This would make the answer “the Constitution would make states less powerful”