1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following countries would be unlikely to have a large maritime industries?

History
2 answers:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Option D => Austria.

Explanation:

Maritime industries or companies refers to companies or industries that deals with things relating to ships and vessels. Maritime companies or industries are one of the industries that are making the buying and selling of goods or products between countries possible.

Apart from the transportation purpose of Maritime industries, they are also involved in fishing and its processing.

For a country to have big Maritime industries it means that such countries must have access to the seas and oceans. From the option given Austria can not have a big Maritime industries because it has no access to the sea that is it is a landlocked country.

melamori03 [73]3 years ago
3 0
Best answer would be D
You might be interested in
Please help not too sure on this one thank you
kozerog [31]
The answer is C, King George III.
7 0
4 years ago
40 POINTS WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
Klio2033 [76]

Answer:

democracy is the best form of government and favor the rule of law, freedom of

expression, and market economies. They ultimately defend that most human

beings would be better off if these practices were universal.

The influence of this liberal tradition has been identified in the American

political thought by historians such as Louis Hartz (1955), Richard Hofstadter

(1948) and Daniel Boorstin (1953). They were perceived in the foreign policy

doctrines by Robert Packenham (1973) during the Cold War and again recognized

in similar manifestations by Castro Santos (2010) and Teixeira (2010) after the

Cold War period. The Liberal Tradition crosses party lines and unites Democratic

liberal internationalists and Republican neoconservatives. It was the foundation

of Bill Clinton’s strategy of democratic enlargement, George W. Bush’s liberty

doctrine, and an important determinant of Barack Obama’s “leading from

behind” strategy.

The historical record shows, however, that U.S. foreign policy decisions have

often favored security interests over democratization and human rights concerns.

From the academic point of view, different theories of International Relations

consider various aspects of the international or domestic scenarios as more or

less pertinent in explaining foreign policy. In the

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What did the Confiscation Act allow the President to seize (take by force)?
ad-work [718]

Answer:

b. property in all rebelling states including slaves

Explanation:

As the Senate met in extraordinary session from July 4 to August 6, 1861, one of the wartime measures it considered was the Confiscation Act, designed to allow the federal government to seize property, including slave property, being used to support the Confederate rebellion.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What tool of the presidency did Johnson use to try to stop Congress’s stricter plan for Reconstruction?
notsponge [240]
The correct answer is veto.

A veto is the ability of the president to reject a law. For example, if the Senate and House of Representatives pass a law they need the president to sign it. The president can refuse to sign it which results in a veto. Then the only way the law would be implemented into American society would be by having the Senate and House of Representatives vote on it again. If both houses vote this law into place with a 2/3rd vote, then this would become law without the presidents help. This process is known as an override.
5 0
4 years ago
Explain the connection between the coup d'état of 1799 and the emergence of the consulate
Nataliya [291]
The coup that took place in 1799 was planned by Napoleon Bonaparte in collusion with Abbe Sieyes and Talleyrand.  The intent was to overthow the Directory and bring a Consulate to power, consisting of Bonaparte, Sieyes, and a 3rd member, Roger-Duclos.  Shortly thereafter a constitution was adopted which gave the First Consul the overarching power -- and that was Napoleon's position.  Thus the French Revolution came to an end and Napoleon came into power.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "over the course of american history, the federal government has _______ compared with state government."
    5·1 answer
  • Did the Anti-Federalists accomplish any of their goals?
    11·1 answer
  • Which organization includes almost all internationally recognize countries in the world
    14·1 answer
  • List the four (4) phases of the state budget process. (Site 1)<br> Please answer
    10·2 answers
  • What were some events that led the United States to enter the war?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of the growing fear of communism and foreigners that America was experiencing in the
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true about Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and Henry Ford?
    5·1 answer
  • ¿Que periodo de la historia de chile se interpreta en el video?
    13·1 answer
  • How should we interpret the status of women at the time of the Constitution’s creation?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP QUICK Explain how the government of New Zealand protects its citizens and enforces laws without a written constitution.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!