Answer:
The general opinion of many Americans at the time of the purchase was that Jefferson was being hypocritical by going through with it. Jefferson was known to have a strict interpretation of the Constitution and believed the president only had the powers the Constitution gave him. Since there was no Constitutional precedent for buying land to add territory to the United States, there was theoretically no Constitutional authority for the president to buy the land.
Many of those in the Federalist party (the opposing party to Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans) believed that he would have objected on Constitutional grounds if any of them had tried to do the same thing. Therefore, the Federalists were very much opposed to the purchase. They also believed that by buying land from France, they would alienate Great Britain, whom they wanted as a close ally.
Answer:
It served as model for later legal systems
.
Explanation:
<em>Roman law</em> was the system of justice that was practiced in Ancient Rome. Most European countries' law systems over the centuries were based on the law of Ancient Rome, proving just to what extent it was valued.
Its history dates back from <em>the Twelve Tables,</em><em> </em>located at the Forum Romanum. They specified the rights and duties of each and every Roman citizen in order to assure the rule of democracy in the Republic of Rome.
The ways that Jefferson Davis' inaugural address reflected the points made in South Carolina Ordinance is that, as the president of the Confederate States of America, he addresses about the Confederate States of America and their true meaning and he also argued that separation from the Union was a "necessity, not a choice." Hope this helps.
In this case, any value given up by not choosing to
<span> spend or save the money is the "opportunity cost", because the money </span>could be spent elsewhere. "trade offs" and opportunity costs are very similar though in economics.
