1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vredina [299]
3 years ago
12

______ is based on four major principles: Injure to life, tell the truth, do not steal, and own no property.

History
2 answers:
lbvjy [14]3 years ago
7 0

Hinduism is based on four major principles: Injure to life, tell the truth, do not steal, and own no property.

Crank3 years ago
3 0

Hinduism is based on those four principles

<em>hope this helped!</em>

<em>have a wonderful day :)</em>

You might be interested in
The World in Spatial Terms Where were authoritarian governments<br> located?
IrinaK [193]

The authoritarian governments of the world in 20th century have usually existed in Africa and West Europe, along with South America

Explanation:

There was a visible rise in authoritarian sentiment across world din the time of the twentieth century leading to many nations hoping that form of the government or being simply taken over by the dictators and it happened all over the world

Most of the nations that are now democracy had been monarchies for some time before they turned back and it has been the same story across the world and specially in newer countries like in Africa and South America

It has also happened in the old, decolonized world in the middle east and with the rise of fascism in Europe.

4 0
3 years ago
From which two theorists did Alfred Marshall borrow the concept of the importance of cost to the supply of goods?
Anna71 [15]
Adam Smith and Davis ricardo
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one reason why Martin Luther's ideas to reform the church gain popularity?
Eva8 [605]

Answer: I believe the answer is D.

Hope this helps!! <3

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hitler used all of the following to get elected except
stiv31 [10]
D D D D D D D D D D d
8 0
3 years ago
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • how did the scientific revolution change the way Europeans viewed the universe and the place of human beings in it
    7·2 answers
  • Why did Metacom declare war on the English colonists?
    6·1 answer
  • It's so which of the following countries are island nations in South East Asia
    6·1 answer
  • Why is it easier to run a republic than a direct democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • What positive emotions did the troops experience and why?
    9·2 answers
  • 8.¿Qué personajes de las religiones del mundo menciona Malala? ¿Por qué crees que los menciona​
    11·1 answer
  • Appeals for money almost always
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these was controlled by rural areas in the first half of the 1900s?
    10·1 answer
  • What's the difference between communism and democracy?
    14·1 answer
  • What is carried under his cloak?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!