Answer:
hellokdhsvksfj sks m fsn cjdwnsdd
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
What we know:
- number of meeting rooms = m
- chairs in each meeting room = 325
Since we need an equation to represent the number of chairs in m meeting rooms, we would multiply the amount of chairs per meeting room (325) by m. This amount is c. So the equation becomes:
c = 325m
Now the question asks for the amount of chairs if there are 7 meeting rooms in the hotel. To find this, substitute 7 for m into c = 325m.
c = 325m
c = 325(7)
c = 2275
Answer:
The equation is c = 325m, and the amount of chairs if m equals 7 is 2,275.
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
the answer is 131 because if you multiply 20 by 8 is 190 then you divide 1/4 by 190 and you get 131
Step-by-step explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
Your inequality is (x being number of people):
175≥35+10x+3x
First, combine like terms so your new inequality is:
175≥35+13x
Then subtract 35 from both sides which makes it:
140≥13x
then divide 140 by 13 making it:
<span>10.769≥x
</span>But because you can't have .769 of a person the actual answer is 10
then you have to subtract 1 because he isn't including himself and there is the answer!:
9≥x
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The answer is f(x)=x²+2x when evaluated with -3 gives you the value of 3
Let's check all functions.
1. The function f(x)=x²<span>+2x when evaluated with 3 gives you the value of 3:
  Evaluated with x means that</span> x = 3.
   f(3) = 3² + 2 * 3 = 9 + 6 = 15 
   15 ≠ 3, so, this is not correct.
2. f(x)=x²<span>-3x when evaulated with -3 give you the value of 3
    Evaluated with -3 means that x = -3.
    (f-3) = (-3)</span>² - 3 * (-3) = 9 + 9 = 18 
    18 ≠ 3, so, this is not correct.
3. f(x)=x²<span>+2x when evaluated with -3 gives you the value of 3
</span>    Evaluated with -3 means that x = -3.
    f(-3) = (-3)² + 2 * (-3) = 9 - 6 = 3
    3 = 3, so this is correct.
4. f(x)=x²-3x when evaluated with -3 gives you the value of 3
    Evaluated with 3 means that x = 3.
    f(3) = (3)² - 3 * 3 = 9 - 9 = 0
    0 ≠ 3, so this is not correct.