Answer:
NO THEY ARE NOT
Explanation:
IN THIS WORLD THERE ARE DIFFERENT RACES SUCH AS WHITE BLACK ASIAN ETC. PEOPLE OFTEN RACIST EACHOTHER FOR THEIR RACE AND CULTRE.BUT NOWADAYS DUE TO VARIOUS PROGRAMME THE RACISM BETWEEN PEOPLE ARE BECOMING LESS. IF ANYONE RACIST FOR YOUR REST IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AS CRIME. HENCE BLACK PEOPLE IS NOT RACIST BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE HAVE TO FACE THE PAIN OF RACISM IN DAILY LIFE EVERYDAY SO THEY DIDNOT RACIST OTHER . SO I GUESS THEY ARENOT
There are many theories to power, be they liberal, socialist or otherwise. Many have been developed over centuries of thought, which pick apart the very nature of our society and world order. But of all the theories that I’ve come across, one sticks out more than any other, and it is the reason I hold such strong free-market/anti-state views. It’s called Public Choice theory, but don’t ask me why, because it seems to explain why any one but ’the public’ makes choices today.
Public Choice theory is modern, having only really taken off during the 1960’s, but I believe it grants a very realistic and worrying view of Britain’s power structure, and exposes many very deep scars which socialism and Keynesianism unintentionally inflicted on our country. It was heavily developed by the US economist James Buchanan, who won the 1986 Nobel Memorial Prize for his work, and who advised Margaret Thatcher through the Institute for Economic Affairs during the late 1970′s.
Just like capitalism, Public Choice theory is based on two simple assumptions about human nature. Firstly, that humans are principally self-interested. That’s not to say we’re selfish, which is somewhat more immoral, but rather that we will always aim to fulfil our wants and desires, economic or otherwise. Secondly, that humans are rational; when presented with a series of options, we will select whichever makes us the most happy for the least cost. Rational Choice theory, as it is called, has come under substantial intellectual attack in the past, and I don’t personally believe that all humans act completely rationally all the time, but as a model for human behaviour, I’d say it provides a pretty good analysis.
Answer:
washington showed that the federal government had the strength to enforce its law; his reaction attracted supporters to the federalist cause.
<span>There have been a total of 85 attacks classified as terrorism on American soil in the last 20 years, including both domestic and international terrorist incidents.</span>
