Answer:
cool...can you answer my question? Search this:
Explanation:
Describe the “typical” English immigrant to the New World in terms of gender, age, and marital status on each of the ships. How does this differ on the two ships?
Answer:
C. People of different races could be restricted to separate areas in public places.
Explanation:
The 1857 Supreme Court case of Plessy vs. Ferguson held that separate but equal facilities are constitutional. This means that racial segregation is legally constitutional as long as it has equal facilities for both races.
This case was a result of an incident when Homer Adolph Plessy, a mixed-race man was traveling in a train bound for Louisiana. He sat at the whites-only section of the train for which he was asked to move to the blacks section which he refused. Convicted of breaking the law, Plessy filed a petition against Hon. John H. Ferguson, the judge who presided over the case. The court ruled in favor of the state with the conclusion that since the train had equal facilities for both races and convicted Plessy.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
The correct answer for this question is "All answers are correct." If a person living in West Africa was captured by a European slaver trader, the conditions that would the person face includes terrible treatment with almost no hope of freedom, brutal work in bad conditions and <span>a life far from home</span>
Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
Quakers, Catholics,Lutherans, a few Jews an others
