Answer:
c) a firm does not have sufficient time to change the level of use some of its inputs.
Explanation:
The definition of short-run in economics is not a term to be used for a specific certain period of time but it means that the period of time is too short that the firms cannot change the level they are using of some of their inputs or costs. It means they do have fixed costs they cannot change. For example, all machinery installed, a yearly rent paid, electricity or others that the firm cannot change unless there is sufficient time. In a short period of time, it will have those costs anyway. The firm cannot change the level of that input. And it is short run of at least one input. It may be many. But it is not necessary to have all inputs unchanged to consider that period of time as short-run.
However, firms can change level of inputs if they have more time. That is cost the long run. All costs are variable costs when we are in long run.
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
<em> </em><em>interest </em><em>earned</em><em> </em><em>on </em><em>both</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>initial</em><em> </em><em>principal</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>the </em><em>interest </em><em>reinvested </em><em>from </em><em>prior </em><em>periods </em><em>is </em><em>called </em><em><u>compound</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>interest</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
________________________________
<em>Compound </em><em>interest</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>The </em><em>interest</em><em> </em><em>which </em><em>is </em><em>added </em><em>on </em><em>to </em><em>the </em><em>initial</em><em> </em><em>investment</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>so </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>this </em><em>will </em><em>itself</em><em> </em><em>gain </em><em>interest </em><em>in </em><em>subsequent</em><em> </em><em>perio</em><em>d</em><em>s.</em>
Answer:
Adding up basic monthly expenses and subtracting this total from take-home pay, plus trying to find out ways or figuring out what to give up to make the monthly loan payment.
Explanation:
A loan is simply a borrowed money that must be repaid at a certain point in time.
Before taking out a loan, it is better you ask yourself some questions like the reason for the loan collection, how much am i earning and willing to set aside for the loan repayment and will it be monthly and other questions.
Answer:
$ 52
Explanation:
Given data:
Price of the stock = $ 50
Commission per share = $ 2
Dividends received = $ 2
Now,
the dividends received is not the part of the stock's cost basis, but it is included in the taxable income for the year.
Therefore,
The customer's cost basis in the stock
= Price of the stock + commission per share
or
= $ 50 + $ 2
or
customer's cost basis in the stock = $ 52
