1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
4 years ago
14

The statistical difference between a process operating at a 5 sigma level and a process operating at a 6 sigma level is markedly

different when it comes to the number of defects present Select one:
a. True
b. False
Business
1 answer:
Artemon [7]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a. True

Explanation:

The statistical difference between a process operating at a 5 sigma level and a process operating at a 6 sigma level is markedly different when it comes to the number of defects present, which is a true statement because as we know process sigma indicates the process variation and is measured in terms of data units, while process sigma count Z, or process sigma level, is a count with no unit of measure and sigma is a statistical term that measures how much a process varies from perfection, based on the number of defects per million units. And also we know that a six sigma process is 1 in which 99.99966 percent of all chances to provide some characteristics of a part are statistically assumed to be free regarding defects.

You might be interested in
Algebra of the income-expenditure model Consider a small economy that is closed to trade, so that its net exports are zero. Supp
ioda

Answer:

a. The equilibrium income level is <u>$100 billion.</u>

b. The new equilibrium level of income will be equal to <u>$500 billion</u>.

c. This economy's multiplier is equal to<u> 4</u>.

Explanation:

a. Calculation of the equilibrium income level

Since;

Y= C + IP + G ........................... (1)

Where;

C = $20 billion + 0.75 × (Y – T)

G = $35 billion

IP=$60 billion

T = $20 billion.

Remove the billion now for simplicity purpose to include later, substitute the values into equation (1) and solve for Y, we have:

Y = $20 + 0.75 * (Y – $120) + $60 + $35

Y = $20 + 0.75Y - (0.75 * $120) + $95

Y - 0.75Y = $20 + $95 - $90

0.25Y = $25

Y = $25 / 0.25

Y = $100

Therefore, the equilibrium income level is <u>$100 billion.</u>

b. Suppose that government purchases are increased by $100 billion. The new equilibrium level of income will be equal to ______ billion.

With this, we now have:

G = $35 billion + $100 billion = $135 billion

Replace this with G in part a and substitute other values as already given in part a into equation (1) and solve for Y, we have:

Y = $20 + 0.75 * (Y – $120) + $60 + $135

Y = $20 + 0.75Y - (0.75 * $120) + $195

Y - 0.75Y = $20 + $195 - $90

0.25Y = $125

Y = $125 / 0.25

Y = $500

Therefore, the new equilibrium level of income will be equal to <u>$500 billion</u>.

c. Based on the effect of the change in government purchases on equilibrium income, you can tell that this economy's multiplier is equal to _______.

Since the change in government purchases makes equilibrium income level to increase from $100 billion to $500 billion, we can calculate the rate of change in the equilibrium income level as follows:

Rate of change in equilibrium income = (New income – Previous income) / Previous income = ($500 - $100) / $100 = 4

With the rate of change of 4, we can tell that this economy's multiplier is equal to 4.

This can be confirmed using the multiplier formula as follows:

Multiplier = 1 / (1 – MPC) ……………………….. (2)

Where;

MPC = 0.75 from the consumption equation given C = $20 billion + 0.75 × (Y – T).

Substitute for MPC in equation (2), we have:

Multiplier = 1 / (1 – 0.75)

Multiplier = 1 / 0.25

Multiplier = 4

Which is the same as already obtained above.

Therefore, this economy's multiplier is equal to<u> 4</u>.

4 0
3 years ago
Kedia Inc. forecasts a negative free cash flow for the coming year, FCF1 = -$10 million, but it expects positive numbers thereaf
Alex777 [14]

Answer:

Kedia Inc value:

$228.070.175,43

228.07 millions dollars

Explanation:

Next year Free Cash Flow: 10,000,000

Folllowing year: 25,000,000

from there, 4% increase

WACC = return = 14%

We use gordon model to know the present value of the future free cash flow growing at 4%:

FCF_0: 25,000,000

FCF_1: 25,000,000 x (1.04) = 26,000,000

\frac{FCF_1}{return-growth} = Intrinsic \: Value

\frac{26,000,000}{0.14-0.04} = Intrinsic \: Value

future FCF: 260,000,000

This is calculated 2 years ahead, thus we need to discount this by 2 years to ge the value today.

We also need to discount the 10,000,000 million in one year and the 25,000,000 millions in two year:

<u><em>For this task we use the present value of a lump sum:</em></u>

Discounted future cash flow:

\frac{FCF}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV  

future dividends growing at 4%: 260,000,000.00

time  2.00

rate  0.14

\frac{260000000}{(1 + 0.14)^{2} } = PV  

PV   200,061,557.40

\frac{25000000}{(1 + 0.14)^{2} } = PV  

future dividends of 25,000,000

PV      19,236,688.21

\frac{10000000}{(1 + 0.14)^{1} } = PV

future dividends of 10,000,000

PV        8,771,929.82

<u>Total value:</u> 200,061,557.4 + 19,236,688.21 + 8,771,929.82 = 228.070.175,43

7 0
4 years ago
Suppose Mexico’s opportunity cost for producing 1 unit of food is 3 units of clothing and the United States’ opportunity cost fo
Paul [167]

Answer:

Mexico export 1 unit of cloth and  import 2 unit of food

Explanation:

given data

Mexico’s cost producing 1 unit of food = 3 units of clothing

US cost producing 1 unit of food = 0.5 units of clothing

Trade  ratio = 1:1

to find out

How beneficial would it be for Mexico

solution

as given in question we know that Mexico opportunity cost of producing food is lower in the US

so here United States will produce food and Mexico will produce cloth

and trade ratio is 1:1 so that  Mexico has export 1 unit of cloth and can import 1 unit of food

and

when the trade ratio is 1 unit of clothing for every 2 unit of food

Mexico export 1 unit of cloth and  import 2 unit of food

so as that Mexico will gains more by  later trade ratio

8 0
3 years ago
After increasing from $5.15 in 2007 to $7.25 in 2009, the inflation-adjusted minimum wage is:
olasank [31]

Answer:

The inflation-adjusted minimum wage is at its long term historical average level.

Explanation:

Inflation is a term use to show increase in price of goods and services in the market due to increase in money supply. Different monetary policies been introduced to check inflation rate as it impact the growth rate of economy.

Inflation are adjusted to remove the affect of price inflation from the data. The formula for inflation adjustments:

Inflation\ adjustment\ value= \frac{Actual\ value}{index\ value}

 Data are used only, which are currency dominated like wage rate, deposite rate, etc.

Minimum wage affect the cost of production and so the employment rate of the country.  

3 0
4 years ago
The following information is available for Robstown Corporation for 20Y8:
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

<u>A. Statement of cost of goods manufactured for the year ended 20Y8</u>

Beginning Work In Process                                                               $63,900

<u>Add Manufacturing Costs :</u>

Materials ($44,250 + $556,600 - $31,700)          $569,150

Depreciation expense-factory equipment            $80,000

Direct labor                                                          $1,100,000

Heat, light, and power-factory                               $53,300

Indirect labor                                                          $115,000

Property taxes-factory                                           $40,000

Rent expense-factory                                             $27,000

Supplies-factory                                                       $9,500

Miscellaneous costs-factory                                    $11,400      

                                                                                                       $2,005,300

Less Ending Work In Process                                                          ($80,000)

Cost of Goods Manufactured                                                        $1,989,250

<u>B. Income statement for the year ended 20Y8</u>

Sales                                                                                             $3,850,000

<em>Less</em> Cost of Goods Sold

Opening Finished Goods                                     $101,200

Add Cost of Goods Manufactured                   $1,989,250

Less Ending Finished Goods                              ($99,800)      ($1,990,650)

Gross Profit                                                                                   $1,859,350

Less Operating Expenses

Advertising expense                                          $400,000

Depreciation expense-office equipment            $30,000

Office salaries expense                                      $318,000

Property taxes-office building                             $25,000

Sales salaries expense                                      $200,000        ($973,000)

Net Income                                                                                   $886,350

Explanation:

Part A

Statement of cost of goods manufactured is a summary of the cost incurred in the manufacturing process.

Cost of Goods Manufactured = Opening Work In Process + Total Manufacturing Costs - Closing Work In Process

Part B

Income Statement shows the profit earned during the reporting period

Profit = Gross Profit (Sales - Cost of Goods Sold) - Operating Expenses

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In order to isolate a subset of records from an open form or datasheet that will be needed only temporarily, a set of criteria m
    8·1 answer
  • You recently purchased a stock that is expected to earn 10 percent in a booming economy, 4 percent in a normal economy, and lose
    9·1 answer
  • Need help asap :(
    13·1 answer
  • Consumer’s expectations of doing new things with varied kinds of information in ways that create value have resulted in the emer
    10·1 answer
  • In year 1, the Consumer Price Index was 120 and the average nominal income was $30,000. In year 2, the Consumer Price Index was
    12·1 answer
  • Under cash-basis accounting, the timing of cash inflows and outflows exactly matches the reporting of revenues and expenses in t
    8·1 answer
  • What is implied if the inventory account has increased?
    8·1 answer
  • ↓↓↓<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Clim_%7Bn%20%5Cto%20%5Cinfty%7D%20a_n%20%5Csqrt%7Bx%7D%20x%5E%7B2%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5Cleq%20
    10·1 answer
  • Please answer both questions in full complete sentences please
    8·1 answer
  • Winslow, Inc. stock is currently selling for $40 a share. The stock has a dividend yield of 3.8 percent. How much dividend incom
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!