Answer:
$ 7.5 million
Explanation:
The investment bank will have a loss which = ( 9.75 - 10.50 ) × 10 million = $ - 7.5 million
The answer to the question presented above would be the tragedy of the commons. When individual fishing boats harvest more fish each year in order to maximize profits while, as a result, threatening the fish population with <span>extinction, it is called tragedy of the commons. </span>
Answer:
brainliest pls
Explanation:
Wages are part of the expenses that are involved in running a business, and add value to the employee in honor of his principal protected note or net investment.
Accepting a good-quality lot would be a <u><em>correct decision.</em></u>
OPTION B "correct decision" is the right answer according to Acceptance Sampling model.
Utilized in quality assurance, acceptance sampling is a statistical method for measuring the reliability of a product or service. It enables a business to ascertain a batch's quality by randomly sampling from it. The standard of quality for the whole set of products will be assumed to be equal to that of the selected sample.
It is impossible for a corporation to constantly test every single one of its goods. It's possible there are too many to inspect efficiently or cheaply. Extensive testing could also compromise the product's quality or render it unmarketable. If a representative sample were tested, the results would be accurate without jeopardizing the rest of the production run.
Acceptance sampling is a method of quality control in which a representative sample of a product batch is tested and its quality is inferred from the results. Acceptance sampling is useful for quality control when implemented properly.
To know more about Acceptance sampling refer to:
brainly.com/question/28192251
#SPJ4
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
