In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
<h3>What is the variables about?</h3>
Note that:
y=-8x+4
y-4=-8x
(y-4)/-8=x
Since the independent variable x is known, one can switch the variable labels and thus it will be:
y=(x-4)/-8
f^-1(x)=(x-4)/-8
This can be written again as:
f^-1(x)=(4-x)/8 :P
Thus one can say No, as he forgot to switch the variable labels after solving for the independent variable.
In the case above, Talib work is not correct as one need to first switch x and y before one can solve for y.
See the first part of the question below
Talib is trying to find the inverse of the function to the right. His work appears beneath it. Is his work correct? Explain your answer.
Learn more about variable from
brainly.com/question/4063302
#SPJ1
<span>For this case we have the following expression:
</span>
<span> We are going to make the following change of variables:
</span>
<span>Rewriting the expression we have:
</span>
<span>Factoring the expression we have:
</span>
<span>Canceling similar terms we have:
</span>
<span>Returning the change we have:
</span>
<span> The resctrictions of the function are those that make the denominator equal to zero.
We have then:
</span>
<span>
Answer: The simplified expression is: </span>
<span>
The restrictions are: </span>
2^10 = 1024 possible ways to answer the test
14/20=0.7 or 70% are soft-centred. If we take two candies we have three possibilities associated with probabilities:
Both soft-centred: 0.7²=0.49 or 49%
Both hard-centred: 0.3²=0.09 or 9%
One of each: 2×0.3×0.7=0.42 or 42%. 49+9+42=100%. So these are all the possible outcomes.
Answer:
768 m²
Step-by-step explanation:
8 x 400 = 3200 cm = 32 m
6 x 400 = 2400 cm = 24m
32 x 24 = 768 m²
