Answer:
Thomas Gibbons won the case Gibbons v. Ogden in 1824 because he <em><u>held a federal license to do business.</u></em>
Explanation:
The Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. Ogden was a case of a territorial issue where the two parties tried to gain superior authority over the rights involved. This court case set the precedent for how state and federal powers are entertained.
Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons were former partners in the steamboat industry. So, when Gibbons got his own steamboat to operate, the issue of who can ply in the waterways became an issue. Ogden has a state permit while Gibbons's was a federal permit.
When Gibbons operates his steamboat on the waterways of New York, Ogden opposed, claiming that Gibbons has no permit. This case became a fight between the state and federal powers, with the issue of who was to have a higher power. And the court agreed or dictated that the federal government has control or precedence over the state.
So, <u>Gibbons won the case because of his federal licence against Ogden's state licence</u>.
I think the answer is Both leaders challenge the European Union.
Both of them are women leaders of Europe having some similar characteristics and have worked for the government for a long period of time.
I hope this answered your question.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Cathedrals in the middle ages were typically large churches and were considered the center church of the bishop's throne. In the medieval times, monumental cathedrals were built to symbolize of faith and a display of creativity within the middle ages society in Europe.
Granting unrestricted freedom to all religions
