No one, not even he could have averted the war without a historical wrong that could no longer be justified in a democracy - the continuation of legal human bondage in the United States. But to answer the question. Yes, I think it was very possible that no guns had to fire, and it would have been to me a revolting development.
In World History, a declaration of independence does exactly that: declare a country's independence from a mother country. For example, the United States declared independence from England, and Comoros declared independence from France.
25% hope this helped good luck! HAVE A BLESSED DAY!
He had fought several battles and then an armistice halted his movement.
I believe that the statement above is true. <span>First samuel, chapter 12 tells of the prophet samuel's displeasure over the nation's desire for a monarchy. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
