Which organization helped provide legal assistance to the families taking part in the case of Brown v. Board of Education? A) th
e National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) B) the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) C) the National School Board Union and Association (NSBUA) D) the National Union for Teachers, Parents, and Children (NUTPC)
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
The professor is likely to think that Nandia is cheating because she had not prepared early enough and that it could be due to internal source problems like family challenges that is overwhelming and needs attention.
The professor is likely to believe if the problem is dealt with Nandia would perform better and be able to focus on her studies and do better.
