Answer:
Atticus says that Bob Ewell must be crazy to attack Jem and scout, it is the only explanation he could think of that will justify a man to attack innocent children.
Heck Tate disagrees and says Bob Ewell was just mean and had enough liquor in him to make him brave enough to attack children, implying that he was a coward.
Of the two, Heck Tate's explanation is the most correct and the one that aligns with how I feel about Bob Ewell.
Explanation:
Atticus cannot understand what could possibly make a man want to kill children unless the man is mad, so he says Bob Ewell was crazy.
Heck Tate however, assures him that Bob Ewell was not crazy but just "mean as hell" and a coward on top of that, so his attack on the children was inevitable.
Heck Tate's explanation is the correct one.
In 1841 Douglass became the editor of the North Star (main clause),<em> an antislavery newspaper </em>(appositives). This is a complex sentence. So, you can give a Ο (circle) in the number.
- Complex Sentence, contains one main clause and at least one subordinate clause
- In the sentence, there is containing one main clause and one appositives
- Main Clause, is an independent clause, which is containing Subject and Verb.
1. In 1841 Douglass became the editor of the North Star
- In 1841: adverb of time
- Subject: Douglass
- Verb: became
- Appositives, is a noun before/after another noun, with commas (,)
- It is not the subject but become NOUN CLAUSE
- A noun clause is defined as SUBORDINATE CLAUSE
Learn more about Appositives here brainly.com/question/1600293
#SPJ4
Wander...
Thank you..
Obvious answer
because the audience would be familiar with them as parables were highly popular then. Also, it being a monk, it is supposed to be a serious story that teaches you something, not a funny or obscene story such as those from the Wife of Bath or the Miller.
