The constitution has been mentioned by many people so far. Sure. That does answer your question in a literal sense. However, which dictators throughout history have ever cared about the laws in their country?
Besides laws and the constitution, what many Canadians would be reluctant to mention is the fact that there are 38+ million people in Canada, many of whom are armed. The prime minister is just one person. Sure, they control the military, but Canada is huge! Armed civilians using guerilla tactics would be a serious challenge for Canada's military, even if they backed the would be dictator, which I think would be unlikely, especially by a majority.
Just to be clear to our southern neighbours, we don't need “the 2nd” to defend ourselves from a would be dictator. We are just fine. And we have lots of guns.
Answer: Juan is a shy guy
Explanation:
Some individuals struggle with public presentations; irrespective of the number. This is not because of they ain't knowledgeable but rather they can't just stand before people to speak. Some person's do carry out various rehearsals to face an audience and they might end up not presenting their work well before the audience, this is the case if Juan; very excited about the topic but can't present it well due to his shy nature.
<em>Se puede ganar mucho, desde el punto de vista empírico yanalítico, del estudio comparativo sistemático de Canadá y Estados
</em>
<em>Unidos. </em><em>Ambos países comparten muchas condiciones ecológicas y demográficas</em><em>; sus niveles de desarrollo económico y de
</em>
<em>movilidad social son similares, y culturalmente tienen también
</em>
<em>mucho en común. Sin embargo, existen claros ejemplos de sus
</em>
<h3>DIFERENCIASS</h3>
Answer: what does it mean to say that a child actively constructs knowledge?
Explanation: From birth, children are active participants in building their own understanding. They do this by experimenting, observing, and participating with other children and adults. Children construct knowledge and build on what they already know.
I believe the answer is: c. receive a great deal of publicity
Overturning hearing due to technological changes usually would make a lot of people that is charge with similar cases had the basis to reduce or eliminate their sentence. Because of the magnitude of the decision, reporters usually really interested in such cases.
