The subcontinent has fewer natural barriers to invasion than East Asia.
There are lot of educated people in India who are fluent in English.
Explanation:
The Indian subcontinent and East Asia are both regions in Asia. They border with each other, with the border being on the northern part of the Indian subcontinent and southwestern part of East Asia. These two regions have lot of differences between them, including culture, languages, religion, lifestyle, politics, geography etc., but they also have several similarities too.
One similarity of these two regions is that both of them have natural barriers, which throughout history have helped a lot in their protection. The Indian subcontinent has only two natural barriers, the Himalayas, which are massive and occupy almost the entirety of the northern part of the region, and the ocean. East Asia has multiple natural barriers, including the Himalayas, Taklamakan Desert, several seas, and the taiga.
One big difference between the regions is that in India there are much higher percentage of educated people that are fluent in English than in East Asia. This is mostly because India is a former British colony, so the English language is a legacy from the colonialism, but it is also seen as advantageous when looking for jobs.
Learn more about the taiga brainly.com/question/11274134
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Spain by "then" will be a depopulated nation dominated by elderly and single people,the country will have lost 5.3million inhabitants, or 11% of the current population, by the middle of the century. If the trends continue, by then the over 65s will make up 34.6% of the population while close to a quarter of a million Spaniards will be over 100yrs old.By that date there will be 1.7million fewer children under 10 than there are now.....
Aight.
It is already answered tho...
Number 2 is mangrove forest. Number 3 is northeast coast of Queensland 4 is Victoria Australia and Tasmania
It's being estimated that dinosaurs lived on Earth from about 237 million years ago to about 66 million years ago. So answers B and D are definately too "old", while answer A is too "young". I'd pick answer C as it's most probable.
