There is a cost of attending a college. The money and time that you spend on your education is an opportunity cost. You could the same amount of money and time for something else. What else could you do? What kind of lifestyle could you choose? What carrier would you have? All of these questions bear the concept of opportunity cost in this context.
Answer:
No, he didn't
Explanation:
Marx believed that the relationship between the lower class and upper class were exclusively beneficial for the upper class.
According to his perspective, Upper class owned the resources and employed the labors from the lower class. The profit that generated from that labor mostly will obtained by the upper class while the lower class obtain very little from it. On top of that, the sales of the product that created by the effort were mostly bought by the lower class citizens and trapped them in never ending cycle.
Answer:
i do think so and i dont think so at the same time
Explanation:
It's like because when you are a slave you have no freedom at all.Yor onor will tell you to do things and if you dont like it then whatever you have to do it. But i think you can be free at the same time in like freedom of speech. if your a slave you can talk to your oner and tell them about this and what tyou don't like but i think most of the time he/she is not going to listen to you and just do whatever they want with you. so in conclusion. no idont think that you can be free and a slave at the same time
The geographic location of New Orleans made it, along with Savannah, an ideal center of the slave trade in the United States.
New Orleans sits on the Mississippi on the Gulf of Mexico. As a result, ships carrying slaves could go from anywhere in the world and have access to the river systems of middle America where slaves were being used.
Answer:
the proper noun is forest and the common noun is hungry
