1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
poizon [28]
2 years ago
13

What was the root of the conflict between Serbia and Austria-Hungary that led to the first shots of WWI?

History
1 answer:
Lunna [17]2 years ago
6 0

The root conflict which uprooted the cause for the first shots of World War I, between Serbia and A-H ( Austria and Hungary) was that Serbia wanted Bosnia to be a part of a Greater Serbia, however Bosnia was under the control of Austria-Hungary.

Answer : Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

Serbia wanted Bosnia, which was annexed by A- H that is, Austria - Hungary in the year 1908, to become the part of a Greater Serbia, however Bosnia was under the control of Austria-Hungary during the year 1908 to 1914 till the advent of World War I.

Black Hand, a militant group who had stance over the ideology of Greater Serbia, took the global crisis to be brought by, by assassinating the Archduke and his wife.

This assassination by Gavrilo Princip who assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, led to an international global level crisis uprooting the conflict causing the First World War.

You might be interested in
The 4th Amendment was included in the Constitution because of colonial experience with who/what?
leonid [27]

Answer:In modern society, it is easy to forget where many of our freedoms come from. It is also dangerous to turn a blind eye to history. Civilizations, military commanders, and leaders of nations have ignored history with devastating results.

Because the 4th Amendment is so vitally important to America, it deserves a look into the history behind its inception into the Constitution. The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution was added as part of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791. It deals with protecting people from the searching of their homes and private property without properly executed search warrants. The 4th Amendment specifically provides:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The Founders believed that freedom from government intrusion into one’s home was a natural right (one granted from God) and fundamental to liberty. The idea that citizens should be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures goes back far into English history. In 1604, Sir Edward Coke first identified this right. He said that “The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury and violence as for his repose.”

During the Colonial era, the King of England looked at the American colonies as simply a financial investment. Britain passed numerous revenue collection bills aimed at generating as much money from the colonists as possible. Obviously, the colonists resented this act by the King and began smuggling operations in order to circumvent the custom taxes imposed by the British Crown.

In response, King George began the use of the conveniently worded “writs of assistance.” These were legal search warrants that were extremely broad and general in scope. British agents could obtain a writ of assistance to search any property they believed might contain contraband goods. They could actually enter someone’s property or home with no notice and without any reason. Agents could interrogate anyone about their use of customed goods and force cooperation of any person. These types of searches and seizures became an egregious affront to the people of the colonies.

These actions by the British Crown would be one the precipitating factors leading to the American Revolution and the eventual forming of our Constitution.

When the 4th Amendment became part of the Constitution, it was originally only applied to the federal government. Later, it was applied to the states through the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Of course, there are many common sense exceptions to the 4th Amendment right to have a properly executed search warrant issued before a search or seizure of private property can be conducted. They are too numerous to list in this column. However, two common examples are (1) a police officer may conduct a pat down search of someone if he or she has observed someone engaging in behavior that would give the officer reasonable, articulable suspicion that a crime has or is being committed; and (2) if a police officer sees someone committing a crime, or believes that he or she has probable cause to suspect someone has committed a crime, the officer may arrest the suspect without a warrant.

Looking back at the reasoning behind liberties in cultures helps to preserve freedoms. It is only when we become disinterested or even indifferent to our Founders that we take a dangerous path toward civilizational decline. We cannot forget why Americans enjoy legal rights like the 4th Amendment.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The city of Rome was the most lavish place to live in the empire. The Romans organized the people they conquered into provinces,
Brums [2.3K]
Its the second one..............
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the best way to help the alcoholic and the family
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
Seeking therapy help is the best.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This type of poll helps explain why, on election night in 2000, news reporters and journalists claimed that al gore won the elec
Elis [28]
Where's the poll and the question, so that I may help you?
7 0
2 years ago
What were reparations meant to do?
Levart [38]
After the end of WWI, the Treaty of Versailles was signed by the Allied Powers and forced upon Germany. In this treaty, Germany had to take full responsibility for starting the war and were forced to pay reparations. A reparation is an amount of money a country/individual must pay for damages they have caused. In this case, Germany had to pay for the damage they caused in other countries during World War I. The cost of these reparations were very expensive, leading to the rapid decline of the German economy.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Name the court case in which the supreme court established its power of judicial
    12·1 answer
  • The __________, lead by de Aguayo, rode on horseback as they protected the mission.
    15·2 answers
  • Write a 500-word essay letter about a parent from Messina, Itlay writing to their young girl who they left behind because of the
    10·1 answer
  • What was legendary King Arthur's sword called? Rosebud Excalibur Challenger Avenger
    13·2 answers
  • Photograph showing a restaurant where a white man is seated inside and African American men and woman are standing outside the c
    13·2 answers
  • Why was the Wannsee Conference called in 1942?
    8·1 answer
  • Whats the cabinet in the government system? (back then in the 1700s)
    10·1 answer
  • The key issues the United States based fighting Japan across the Pacific ocean
    11·1 answer
  • How did the idea of nonviolence effect Diane Nash's view of segregation?
    11·1 answer
  • What were the two components of the government of ancient Athens?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!